Professor Dunnigan, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.41	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.67	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.90	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.81	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.58	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.64	4.19	4.25
Professor Schmidt, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.00	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.00	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.17	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.08	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.06	4.19	4.25
Professor Terhorst, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.08	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.75	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.92	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.92	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.71	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.70	4.19	4.25
Professor Putzel, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.05	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.67	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.90	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.70	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.27	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.43	4.19	4.25
Professor Brofman, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.00	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			3.30	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			3.80	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			3.95	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.12	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.31	4.19	4.25
Professor Findlay, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.86	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.28	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.71	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.22	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.14	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.22	4.19	4.25
Professor Dunnigan, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.90	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.40	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.95	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.60	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.33	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.41	4.19	4.25
Professor McGurrin, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.13	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			2.83	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.83	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			2.80	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.25	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.39	4.19	4.25
Professor Burns, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.13	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.71	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.86	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.71	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.88	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.22	4.19	4.25
Professor Schmidt, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.65	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.80	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			5.00	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.20	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.41	4.19	4.25
Professor Brofman, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.35	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.06	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.41	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			3.94	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.60	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.78	4.19	4.25
Professor Wilkinson, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.65	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.69	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.81	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.67	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.60	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.65	4.19	4.25
Professor Macek, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.50	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.29	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.44	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.29	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.12	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.14	4.19	4.25
Professor Dunnigan, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.41	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.67	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.90	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.81	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.58	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.64	4.19	4.25
Professor Killgallon, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.26	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.68	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.84	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.42	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.94	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.23	4.19	4.25
Professor Bloom, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.62	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.80	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.90	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.40	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.24	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.35	4.19	4.25
Professor Bloom, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.50	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.88	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.94	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.81	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.25	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.50	4.19	4.25
Professor Fettner, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.41	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.67	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.90	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.81	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.58	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.64	4.19	4.25
Professor Dunnigan, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.50	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.94	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.88	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.71	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.77	4.19	4.25
Professor Putzel, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.81	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.70	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.45	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.33	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.43	4.19	4.25
Professor Brofman, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.57	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			3.76	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			3.95	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			3.60	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.27	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.48	4.19	4.25
Professor Kidd, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.00	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.76	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.76	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.67	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.20	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.37	4.19	4.25
Professor Kidd, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.00	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.88	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.63	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.88	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.57	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.58	4.19	4.25
Professor Bloom, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.80	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.67	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.89	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.13	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.13	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.27	4.19	4.25
Professor Killgallon, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.67	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.10	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.76	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.29	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.78	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.00	4.19	4.25
Professor Pekarske, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.18	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.78	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.88	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.63	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.90	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.24	4.19	4.25
Professor Fettner, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.27	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			2.80	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.33	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			3.20	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			2.56	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			2.98	4.19	4.25
Professor Walters, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.86	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.38	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.62	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.10	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.79	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.01	4.19	4.25
Professor Fettner, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.00	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			3.83	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.75	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.25	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.08	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.61	4.19	4.25
Professor Fettner, Compostion			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.00	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			3.50	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.00	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			2.00	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.00	4.19	4.25
Professor McCarthy, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.63	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.33	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.33	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.33	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.88	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.66	4.19	4.25
Professor Sneeringer, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.15	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.69	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.92	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.46	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.80	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.16	4.19	4.25
Professor Mabe, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			2.27	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			1.64	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			1.60	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			2.09	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			2.30	4.19	4.25
Professor Mabe, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			2.27	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.22	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.38	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.50	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.75	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.82	4.19	4.25
Professor Hickernell, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.60	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			3.62	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.54	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			3.69	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.63	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.77	4.19	4.25
Professor Walters, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.64	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.10	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.90	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.10	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.80	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.01	4.19	4.25
Professor Pekarske, Composition			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.17	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			3.90	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.70	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.00	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.70	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.95	4.19	4.25
Professor Sims, Composition ESL Students			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.38	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.33	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.79	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.54	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.67	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.61	4.19	4.25
Professor Collins, Composition ESL Students			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.94	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.50	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.69	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.27	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.21	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.29	4.19	4.25
Professor Findlay, Introduction to Literature			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.28	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.24	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.88	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.42	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.91	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.18	4.19	4.25
Professor Harris, English Grammar Usage			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.86	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.44	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.73	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.40	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.67	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.00	4.19	4.25
Professor Fallon, Issues in World Literature			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.96	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.35	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.76	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.38	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.95	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			3.51	4.19	4.25
Professor Fitzpatrick, Modern British Novel			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			3.57	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.62	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.92	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.38	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.90	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.14	4.19	4.25
Professor Pekarske, Beauty Pleasure Dec IM			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.56	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.17	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.83	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.00	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			3.75	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.06	4.19	4.25
Professor Benson, Wirters Look at War			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.10	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.39	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.93	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.28	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.04	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.24	4.19	4.25
Professor Blumberg, Comic Book Literature			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.21	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.50	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.84	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.47	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.39	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.46	4.19	4.25
Professor Orgelfinger, Intro to Shakespeare			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.78	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			5.00	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.80	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.32	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.58	4.19	4.25
Professor Shivan, Intro Creative Writing-Fiction			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.61	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.85	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.95	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.80	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.86	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.84	4.19	4.25
Professor Fallon, Intro to Creative Writing-Poetry			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.79	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.54	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.77	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.25	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.50	4.19	4.25
Professor Benson, Intro Writing Creative Essay			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.75	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.33	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.78	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.11	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.30	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.40	4.19	4.25
Professor Fallon, Intro Writing Creative Essay			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.06	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.42	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.93	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.58	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.33	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.43	4.19	4.25
Professor Shivnan, Intro Writing Creative Essay			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.44	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.63	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			4.88	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material			4.56	4.24	4.27
5. The instructors overall effectiveness			4.55	4.05	4.08
6. Our Overall Score			4.60	4.19	4.25
Professor Farabaugh, Analysis Lit Lang			Instructor	Department	UMBC
			Score	Mean	Mean
1. New insights/skills learned from course			4.53	4.05	4.27
2. Preparedness of lectures			4.86	4.30	4.43
3. Instructor interest in subject			5.00	4.71	4.70
4. Clarity of lecture material